Home Updates

Think Twice Before Discarding Food Waste

Food Waste DisposalRacine, Wisconsin – A new study on the impact of food waste disposal systems reveals that scraping food waste into an in-sink disposer is a better environmental choice than landfills for reducing global warming potential. And choosing the sink over a commercial composting operation can offer energy-saving advantages.

The study, a peer-reviewed Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) commissioned by InSinkErator, a business of Emerson (NYSE: EMR), reports that disposing of food scraps in landfills produces nearly twice as much global warming potential as food scraps processed through in-sink disposers to wastewater treatment facilities. Put into context, a community of 30,000 households could avoid the equivalent of more than 2,000 tons of carbon dioxide emissions if most of its food scraps went through a disposer to a wastewater treatment facility instead of to a landfill. That is akin to eliminating 4.6 millions of miles of car traffic.

The study also highlights the potential to generate renewable energy by using disposers. Wastewater treatment facilities outfitted with anaerobic digesters – like those serving dozens of major cities such as San Francisco and Milwaukee – can extract energy from pulverized food waste to create heat and power. The remaining biosolids can then be turned into fertilizer products.

“Food waste disposers play a critical role in the environmentally responsible management of food scraps,” said Tim Ferry, InSinkErator President. “Imagine the potential environmental benefits if all of the approximately 50 percent of U.S. homes with installed disposers regularly bypassed the trash and disposed of food scraps with the disposer instead.”

Conducted under strict protocols, the study analyzed four primary systems for managing food waste – wastewater treatment, landfills, incineration, and advanced commercial composting. Key findings include:

  • Grinding food waste with a disposer and sending it to a wastewater treatment plant has lower global warming potential than sending it to landfills.
  • The system of sending food waste to advanced treatment plants can require less energy than landfill, incineration, and commercial composting – and may also generate energy. This includes the environmental impact from the manufacturing, distribution, use, and end-of-life of the food waste disposers themselves.
  • Where food waste is processed through a wastewater treatment plant outfitted with anaerobic digestion and cogeneration, it can result in a reduction of global warming potential – even less than centralized composting facilities.

“In thinking about effective tools for managing food scraps, wastewater treatment systems are often overlooked despite their daily role in turning liquid waste into valuable resources like renewable energy,” Ferry said. “Understanding the environmental impacts of the various methods of food waste disposal enables consumers to make responsible choices for the environment.”

More information about the study and the InSinkErator environmental story is available at:

About InSinkErator

Headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin, InSinkErator, a business of Emerson, is the world’s largest manufacturer of food waste disposers and instant hot water dispensers. For more information, visit www.InSinkErator.com.

Logo EmersonAbout Emerson

Emerson (NYSE: EMR), based in St. Louis, Missouri (USA), is a global leader in bringing technology and engineering together to provide innovative solutions to customers in industrial, commercial, and consumer markets through its network power, process management, industrial automation, climate technologies, and tools and storage businesses. Sales in fiscal 2010 were $ 21 billion. For more information, visit www.Emerson.com.

Source: Emerson.